GAIA
GAIA (General AI Assistants) is a benchmark for real-world assistant tasks, built by researchers from Meta, Hugging Face and AutoGPT (Mialon et al.) and presented at ICLR 2024. It contains 466 questions that are conceptually simple for people but hard for current systems, because answering them requires a chain of reasoning, live web browsing, handling of attached files and images, and the use of external tools. Each question has a single unambiguous answer, and the set is graded across three difficulty levels, from a few steps to long multi-step investigations.
You access GAIA through its gated dataset on Hugging Face: you sign in and accept the usage terms before the files are released. The public validation split ships with answers for local development, while the answers to the 300 held-out test questions are withheld, so scoring on the test set is done only by submitting to the public leaderboard. The data is now Parquet-backed (previously JSONL), roughly 110 MB in total, with attachments referenced by file path.
For RAG and agent work, GAIA is an evaluation set rather than training material. It is one of the most cited yardsticks for general assistants and agentic pipelines, measuring whether a system can plan, retrieve, read documents and combine tools to reach a correct answer, rather than testing a single skill in isolation. At launch, human respondents reached about 92 per cent while GPT-4 with plugins reached roughly 15 per cent, which captures the gap it was built to expose. It is best used as a hard end-to-end gate for assistants and tool-using agents before release.
On licensing, treat GAIA with care: the dataset card shows no formal licence identifier, access is gated, and the terms ask you not to reshare the data outside a gated or private Hugging Face repository, not to post it in a crawlable form, and not to train on the development set. Confirm the current terms on the dataset card before any redistribution or commercial use. It sits alongside our other agentic entries, such as BFCL, as a complementary, broader test of end-to-end assistant capability.
Related sources
APEX-Agents
Mercor's benchmark of 480 long-horizon, document-grounded professional tasks across investment banking, consulting and corporate law, with rubrics, gold outputs and an open execution harness for evaluating enterprise AI agents.
Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)
The de facto benchmark for how well language models call functions, APIs and tools. Built by UC Berkeley's Gorilla project, it spans Python, Java, JavaScript and REST with simple, parallel, irrelevance-detection, multi-turn and agentic cases. Apache 2.0 and freely available.
Glaive Function Calling v2
A widely used open dataset of about 113,000 synthetic multi-turn chat conversations that include function calls and their results, made by Glaive AI. One of the most downloaded open datasets for fine-tuning models to call tools, released under Apache 2.0.
Nemotron RL Agentic Conversational Tool-Use (Pivot v1)
NVIDIA's reinforcement learning dataset for conversational tool use, recasting expert multi-turn trajectories into 170,320 behaviour-cloning problems across 838 domains such as IT support, travel and EdTech. Released with the NeMo Gym framework for RLVR post-training.