Chemistry and materials data is some of the most structured you will ever feed a RAG system, the setup that answers questions by retrieving relevant records and then generating a reply from them. Instead of loose prose, you get molecules identified by standard codes, reactions with defined inputs and outputs, and material properties tied to measured values. Much of it is held together by ontologies, shared vocabularies that agree on what each term means and how concepts relate, so a “boiling point” or a “binding affinity” means the same thing across records. That consistency makes retrieval far more reliable than free text.
Choosing within this category depends on what your questions are about. Compound-centred databases like PubChem and ChEBI are the place to start for identifying and describing molecules. ChEMBL leans towards bioactivity and drug discovery, the Materials Project towards computed physical properties, and the Open Reaction Database towards how reactions actually run. Match the source to the question rather than reaching for the largest table.
The catch with structured scientific data is that it is rarely plain text, so you cannot just chunk it into passages. You will usually need to convert records into readable descriptions before embedding them, the step of turning text into numerical vectors a system can search by meaning. Watch the identifiers too: a molecule can be written several ways, and mixing formats quietly breaks retrieval. Licences here are generally permissive, though a few sources restrict commercial use, so check before you build a product on one. The sources below span compounds, reactions, and material properties, each strong in its own corner.